Educating Children Who
Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing:
Additional Learning ProblemsAuthor: B.J.
Pollack
ERIC EC Digest #E548 August 1997
What
Is Meant by "Additional Learning Problems" in the Deaf
Or Hard of Hearing Population?
Hearing loss has
far-reaching, critical effects on childhood development of cognitive
(thinking) and linguistic (language) skills. The occurrence of other
disabilities in combination with diminished hearing creates "additional
learning problems" which significantly add to the complexity
of educating the student who is deaf or hard of hearing. The prevalence
of other disabilities in addition to hearing loss is approximately
three times as large (30.2%) in the deaf or hard of hearing population
as in the general school population. Some of this may be explained
by the varying causes of hearing loss. Some of the current documented
etiologies of childhood deafness include maternal rubella (2%), prematurity
(5%), cytomegalovirus (1%), and meningitis (9%)(Moores, 1987). It
is logical to assume that the population demonstrating a hearing loss
is at a high risk for additional disabilities since the previously
mentioned etiologies are also known to be associated with neurological
involvements. The prevalence
of several specific disabilities occurring with diminished hearing
has been documented over time (Craig & Craig, 1993, 1983, 1973).
The three additional disabilities most often reported in children
who are deaf or hard of hearing are learning disabilities, intellectual
disabilities, and emotional/ behavioral disabilities. The 1993 reference
issue of the American Annals of the Deaf reports learning disabilities
as the largest co-occurring disability at a prevalence of 9%. The
prevalence of intellectual disabilities occurring with a hearing loss
followed closely at 8%. The co-occurrence of emotional/behavioral
disabilities was the least at a 4% occurrence rate. Although there
are difficulties in definitively characterizing these frequently co-occurring
disabilities, the following definitions may apply. Students with co-occurring
emotional/behavioral disabilities are described as displaying inappropriate,
disruptive, aggressive behaviors that interfere with learning. Students
with hearing loss and intellectual disabilities are characterized
by a generalized delay in development across all areas of learning
with limited problem-solving abilities and lowered adaptive or functional
skills. Students diagnosed with learning disabilities and hearing
loss are generally found to be in the average or above average range
of intelligence displaying skills and abilities in many different
ways while displaying specific learning deficits that restrict accomplishments.
They are described as exhibiting unusual learning characteristics
considered atypical of students who are deaf and hard of hearing in
general; these greatly affect their progress. These students are not
progressing academically in comparison to the documented parameters
of delayed language and concept learning found in the general population
of students who are deaf or hard of hearing (Bunch & Melnyk, 1989).
In an effort to recognize this subgroup's uniqueness, the field appears
to be moving away from using the label "learning-disabled hearing-
impaired" and, instead, is beginning to label these students
"deaf or hard of hearing with additional mild disabilities,"
"atypical learners with hearing loss," and "deaf or
hard of hearing learners with additional learning problems."
How Are Additional
Learning Problems Identified in Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing? Identification
of additional learning problems among children with diminished hearing
is a difficult and complex task. Part of the difficulty arises from
the fact that a hearing loss by itself creates pervasive learning
problems that usually result in very delayed language acquisition
and consequently delayed academic skills. Therefore, the identification
of any other interfering or additional influencing factors affecting
the students' learning can pose difficult issues. What difficulties
come with the hearing loss and what difficulties are caused by another
source or element? Furthermore, recognizing the additive effect of
co-occurring disabilities, what unique learning profile is created
by the combination of a hearing loss and the additional disability
that are above and beyond any profile characterizing each individual
disability alone? Sound assessment
practices using interdisciplinary teams are important when identifying
additional disabilities in students who are deaf or hard of hearing
(Paplinger & Sikora, 1990). This is particularly true when one
considers that the characteristics displayed by students with co-occurring
disabilities are often the same. A consistent lack of language learning,
attention problems, retention difficulties, and delayed academic skills
are phrases that are heard when professionals in the field describe
students who have hearing losses and learning disabilities, intellectual
disabilities, or emotional/behavioral problems. Therefore, differential
diagnosis is critical to determining an accurate learning profile
for the individual student, which includes a clear determination of
the disabilities influencing that profile. The assessment should consist
of teacher observations and appropriate standardized assessment measures
as well as informal assessment procedures. Professionals involved
should include school psychologists, classroom teachers, occupational
and physical therapists, speech/language pathologists, audiologists,
and any necessary medical personnel such as nurses, psychiatrists,
etc. The team should provide careful interpretation of the assessment
results with recommendations and suggestions for educational programming.
What Are Some
Questions to Ask in Deciding Whether or Not to Refer My Child/student
for an Evaluation? Is the student
who is deaf or hard of hearing progressing as would be expected when
compared to his/her hearing impaired peers? This should be the first
question when considering evaluation for a student with a hearing
loss. Researchers (Kretschmer & Kretschmer, 1989; McAnally et
al., 1994; and Yoshinaga-Itano, 1986) have documented parameters of
delayed language acquisition and academic progress commonly seen in
learners who are deaf or hard of hearing. Given the opportunities
to learn language and academic skills through appropriate and efficient
modes of communication, a learner with a hearing loss should progress
in expected patterns of growth and achievement. If this is not happening,
questions should be raised as to the reasons why. Is the student
with a hearing loss displaying any characteristics that are not usually
seen with a hearing loss? Having a hearing loss brings with it many
characteristics that affect the learning of the student. However,
the hearing loss alone is not necessarily accompanied by such characteristics
as visual-perceptual problems, attention deficits, perceptual-motor
difficulties, severe inability to learn vocabulary and English structures,
consistent retention and memory problems or consistent distractive
behaviors or emotional factors. If any of these kinds of behaviors
characterize the student who is deaf or hard of hearing, then an investigation
into the possible influencing factors should be requested. What Are Common
Strategies Used to Help These Students? It is very difficult
to determine common strategies for students with additional learning
problems primarily because each individual learning profile will be
different depending on the number and nature of the various influencing
factors. After some time spent looking for "fix-it" strategies,
the professionals in this field appear to be moving toward the belief
that all students with hearing losses should have individualized approaches
to instruction, including those with additional learning problems
(Powers, 1993). It is indeed a challenge to the professionals in the
field to match the assessment learning profile with appropriate educational
strategies to address the delineated problems. Generally speaking
the following strategies may be useful. For those students with additional
learning problems that include severe lack of vocabulary and simple
syntax knowledge, work using pictures and picture symbols to support
speech and/or signs has proven beneficial (Chalk, 1996). For those
hard of hearing students who display characteristics more commonly
associated with processing or understanding of sound, learning disabled
students have benefitted from many of the aural/oral remediation techniques
used to improve listening skills (Roth, 1991). Behavior techniques
that include clearly defined choices and expectations with natural
consequences have proven effective. Addressing emotional factors through
the educational program and individual or group counseling when appropriate
have also proven beneficial (Gage, et al, 1994; Rasing & Duker,
1993). References
and Additional Resources Bunch, G. &
Melnyk, T. (1989). A review of the evidence for a learning-disabled,
hearing impaired sub-group. American Annals of the Deaf, 134, 297-300.
Chalk, P. (1996,
Oct). New says of using communication symbols. Paper presented at
the Fall LEA Workshop, Cave Spring, GA. Craig, W.N. &
Craig, H.B. (Eds.).(1993). Tabular summary of schools and classes
in the U.S. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(2), 169-170. Craig, W.N. &
Craig, H.B. (Eds.). (1983). Tabular summary of schools and classes
in the U.S. American Annals of the Deaf, 127(2), 188-189. Craig, W.N. &
Craig, H.B. (Eds.). (1973). Tabular summary of schools and classes
in the U.S. American Annals of the Deaf, 118(2), 134-135. Gage, S., Lou,
M.W. & Charlson, E.S. (1994). A social learning program for deaf
adolescents. Perspectives for Teachers of the Deaf, 13(2). Kretschmer, R.
& Kretschmer, L. (1989). Communication competence: Impact of the
pragmatics revolution on education of hearing impaired children. Topics
in Language Disorders, 9(4), 1-16. McAnally, P.L.,
Rose, S. & Quigley, S.P. (1994). Language learning practices with
the deaf. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Moores, D.F. (1987).
Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles, practices.(3rd ed.). Boston:
Houghton Mifflin. Paplinger, D.
& Sikora, D. (1990). Diagnosing a learning disability in a hearing
impaired child. American Annals of the Deaf, 118, 480-487. Powers, A. R.
& Elliott, R. N. (Eds.). (1993). Deaf and hard of hearing students
with mild additional disabilities. Monograph. Tuscaloosa, AL: The
University of Alabama. Rasing, E.J. &
Duker, P.C. (1993). Acquisition and generalization of social behaviors
in language-disabled deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(4),
362-369. Roth, V. (1991).
Students with learning disabilities and hearing impairment: Issues
for the secondary and post-secondary teacher. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 24(7), 391-397. Yoshinaga-Itano,
C. & Downey, D. (1986). A hearing-impaired child's acquisition
of schemata: Something is missing. Topics in Language Disorders, 7(1),
45-57. For more information
about the assessment process, see ERIC Digest E550 on assessment of
students who are deaf and hard of hearing. For more information about
services available in your state, contact your state's school for
the deaf. A listing of these may be found annually in the April edition
of the American Annals of the Deaf periodical. Dr. Pollack
is the educational diagnostician on the Diagnostic and Evaluation
Team, Atlanta Area School for the Deaf.
The Council for Exceptional Children
1920 Association Drive
Reston, VA 20191
Toll Free: 1.800.328.0272
TTY: 703.264.9449
E-mail: ericec@cec.sped.org
Internet: http://ericec.org
ERIC Digests are in the public domain and may be freely reproduced and
disseminated, but please acknowledge your source. This publication was
prepared with funding from the U.S. Department of Education, Office
of Educational Research and Improvement, under contract no. RR93002005.
The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the
positions or policies of OERI or the Department of Education. |