Educating Children
Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing:
English-Based Sign SystemsAuthor:
Gerilee Gustason
ERIC EC Digest #E556, August 1997
What Is Meant by
English-based Sign Systems? Sign language as used
by deaf adults may resemble English, or it may be American Sign Language
(ASL), which has a grammar, syntax, and idioms distinct from English.
ASL is sometimes called a natural language because it evolved through
use by people who were deaf. In contrast, English-based sign systems were
developed by educators. These systems adopted much of the vocabulary of
ASL but added grammatical features of English such as articles (a, an,
the), verb endings (-s, -ing, -ed, -en), and other markers of English.
English-based sign systems follow English syntax. In some systems English
words are presented literally (e.g., one sign is used for the word "run"
no matter what the meaning). In other systems the signs for English words
may vary depending on the meaning of the word, to more closely relate
to ASL. One such system that
remains close to ASL is Signed English (Bornstein, Hamilton, & Saulnier,
1983). This system is aimed at preschool and lower elementary children
and includes a limited number of markers (e.g., -s, -ed, -ly). It retains
many conceptual signs from ASL, such as "hair-yellow" for "blond".
A number of children's storybooks such as Little Red Riding Hood are available
in this system. A system no longer widely used that was extremely close
to English is Seeing Essential English (Anthony, 1971), often referred
to as SEE 1. This system used separate signs for English morphemes and
signed by "root words" such as gene as the root for genetic,
general, generous. The most widely used system that is close to English
is Signing Exact English, or SEE 2. This system includes many more markers
than Signed English (e.g., -ous, -ness, -ment) and signs by English word
rather than by concept. In SEE 2 one would use the same signs for "is
running" whether the subject is a man, the water, one's nose, or
a car. In ASL the sign for "run" would differ in each of those
situations. Apart from specific
vocabulary, all of the sign systems include the visual features of a signed
language that add meaning and intonation to signing, such as shaking the
head with a negative statement, raising the eyebrows with a yes-no question,
placing signs according to meaning, and using facial expression and body
movement to convey mood and tone. Many individuals and
programs use a mixture of systems. Because one can speak nearly twice
as fast as one can sign, it takes commitment and practice to sign complete
English. Many individuals sign in English word order but do not include
word endings or markers. Some choose to sign by word meaning; others choose
to follow the SEE 2 principle of signing by English word. Who Can Use An
English-Based System? English-based systems
are used by many parents of young children who are deaf. They are also
used widely by educators. Some of the vocabulary developed by these sign
systems has been accepted in widespread use in ASL, but many Deaf adults
have negative attitudes toward the use of such a system. They view it
as a denial of Deaf culture and a failure to accept a child's deafness.
Parents and educators, on the other hand, use it because they wish to
expose the child to English in a clearly visible modality. In addition,
many parents prefer it because English is their own language, and they
wish their children to know the same language. A number of families and
schools use such a system as one component of a total approach to communication,
including ASL, amplification, speechreading, reading, and writing. Persons
who work with families of young children, or with the children themselves,
should be familiar with the system used in their locality. What Are the Benefits
of an English-Based Sign System? Children learn the
language of their environment when they perceive it clearly. Use of an
English-based sign system provides them with access to English during
the language learning years. Such a sign system is also useful with older
students who have not yet mastered English, when used with a second language
learning approach. As with any language, the fluency of the child will
depend on the fluency of the language models in his/her environment. When
fluent and complete models are consistently available, English can be
learned in a normal manner. This is a critical point for English-based
sign systems, since English literacy has been and remains very important
and very difficult for many individuals who are deaf. What Are the Limitations
of an English-Based Sign System? Because English-based
sign systems do differ from ASL in grammar and in the use of English markers,
some Deaf adults do not like them. They feel it is an attempt by hearing
persons to impose hearing standards on children who are deaf. In addition,
because speech is faster than signs, an individual must be committed to
presenting complete English in signs and to make the effort to learn and
become fluent. Persons who are not wholly committed may end up signing
only part of their spoken message, presenting incomplete English that
does not fit ASL syntax either. What Are Some Questions
to Ask Before Choosing an English-based Sign System? - Do I believe in
the importance of presenting complete English?
- Am I willing to
take the time to become fluent?
- What is used in
the schools in the area where I live?
- What materials
are available to help me learn?
- How will I react
if I meet negative attitudes from deaf adults?
- How will I ensure
the child's involvement with the Deaf community and his/her self-esteem
as a person who is deaf?
References and
Additional Resources Anthony, D. (1971).
Seeing Essential English. Anaheim, CA: Educational Services Division,
Anaheim Union High School District. Bornstein, H. (Ed.)
(1990). Manual communication: Implications for Education. Washington,
DC: Gallaudet University Press. Bornstein, J., Hamilton,
L., & Saulnier, K. (1983). The comprehensive Signed English dictionary.
Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Brasel, K. & Quigley,
S. (1977). The influence of certain language and communication environments
in early childhood on the development of language in deaf individuals.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 95-107. Gaustad, M.A.G. (1986).
Longitudinal effects of manual English instruction on deaf children's
morphological skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 101-128. Luetke-Stahlman, B.
(1988). The benefit of oral-English-only as compared with signed input
to hearing impaired students. The Volta Review, 90(7), 349-361. Luetke-Stahlman, B.
(1993). Three PSE studies: Implications for educators. In M.P. Moeller
(Ed.), Proceedings: Issues in Language and Deafness. Omaha, NE: Boys Town
National Research Hospital. The Gallaudet University
Bookstore (800 Florida Ave., NE, Washington DC 20002) carries both Signed
English and Signing Exact English materials. Gallaudet University Press
publishes the Signed English materials, and has published a book, Manual
communication: Implications for education (1990), edited by H. Bornstein,
which provides detailed information on the topic. Specific questions about
Signing Exact English may be referred to the SEE Center for the Advancement
of Deaf Children (10443 Los Alamitos Blvd., Los Alamitos, CA 90720). SEE
2 materials are published by Modern Sign Press, Inc., PO Box 1181, Los
Alamitos, CA 90720. Dr. Gustason, who
originated the SEE 2 system, is director of the SEE Center for the Advancement
of Deaf Children. She is fluent in oral English, SEE 2, and ASL.
The
ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education (ERIC EC)
The Council for Exceptional Children
1920 Association Drive
Reston, VA 20191
Toll Free: 1.800.328.0272
TTY: 703.264.9449
E-mail: ericec@cec.sped.org
Internet: http://ericec.org
ERIC Digests are in the public
domain and may be freely reproduced and disseminated, but please acknowledge
your source. This publication was prepared with funding from the Office
of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education,
under contract no. RR93002005. The opinions expressed in this report do
not necessarily reflect the positions of policies of OERI or the Department
of Education. |