Assistive Technology:
A Parent's PerspectiveAuthor - Julie Fleisch,
Seattle, Washington
NICHCY News Digest Number 13 1989 Resources Updated, April 1996Note: This publication was
originally released in 1989 and, as such, does not contain the most current
information on assistive technology. NICHCY offers this document on the Internet
with the caveat that, while readers can gain basic information about assistive
technology from this document, it is important that they supplement this overview
with more current readings from other sources. For current resources check out
Parent
Pals Assistive Technology Resources.
Last year my son, Colin,
lost a tooth at school as the speech therapist was feeding him his lunch. She
told him he should take it home and put it under his pillow for the tooth fairy.
The conversation continued with the therapist asking Colin about the tooth fairy.
"Does the tooth fairy come to your house?" Colin pointed to YES on
his wheelchair tray. "Does the tooth fairy come to visit your sister?"
YES. "Has the tooth fairy ever come to see you?" NO. When the speech
therapist related this conversation to me, I felt so neglectful. I know my son
so well yet I had assumed he didn't understand the whole tooth fairy concept.
Colin has surprised me many times with his understanding and observations of
his world; a world he has trouble interacting with. His world is a little
different than the one most children live in. Colin has cerebral palsy.
He is unable to walk yet gets around on his knees, in his wheelchair,
and on an adapted tricycle. He is also non-verbal and relies on an alphabet
board -- both manual and programmed varieties -- to spell out messages.
Through his spelling boards we are slowly unlocking some doors for him.
He has so many limitations yet so many abilities, the conflict between
the two being the biggest challenge for those who work with him. How do
we deal with the limitations so that the abilities can be used? When Colin was born
nine years ago, my husband and I had no idea how complicated our life
was to become. Our resources have been stretched and our plans altered
drastically. We started adapting things and purchasing special equipment
for him when he was very young. Because we fall in an economic bracket
that does not allow us financial assistance for Colin, we have learned
to be very creative. I carry an Allen wrench in my purse and can do almost
anything with velcro. There have been a long list of needs and a variety
of ways we have tried to meet those needs. Our experiences have brought
forth, for me, some major areas of concern for families who have children,
like Colin, with high needs for assistive devices and technology. Where
do families find the financial resources to meet their child's needs?
Who do parents go to for help? And how do parents keep up with the ever-evolving
technical knowledge so that they can make wise and appropriate decisions?
The funding issues
are very challenging for schools and programs that work with special kids.
They are even more difficult for families. This is one of the stresses
that affects families that already have enough stress to deal with. The
paperwork that accompanies insurance claims and the type of coverage most
families can afford is part of the problem. The other part is finding
the funding when insurance doesn't provide coverage. We have purchased
many things for Colin and have constructed many more ourselves because
we couldn't afford to purchase them. I sometimes envy the lower income
families because they actually have better funding with the state and
federal assistance than families who don't qualify financially. We built
Colin his early chairs and standers and did a lot with loaned equipment
from other facilities and families. When we wanted to buy him a computer
and the adaptions to run it, we chose to get community assistance. A letter
was written and mailed out to local organizations. We received the funding
and made some nice connections in the community. We did, however, have
to put Colin on display at fund raisers, a concept that I didn't care
for. When we ordered Colin's big mobility system and communication device
four years ago, our choice was made with funding being an important factor.
Our insurance would cover the power chair but not the communication system.
So we put them together for ordering purposes and used the communication
system to drive the chair. We ended up not getting the mobility system
Colin could operate easily by doing this but how else could we fund a
very expensive communication system, and who covers the cost of the ramp
needed to get the chair into our home or the van and lift to transport
him? Families need someone
to go to for help in managing their funding concerns. A lot of time and
energy is used up and compromises are sometimes made that are not in the
best interest of the children. In their effort to find the right equipment,
parents are often placed in a position of making decisions without knowing
all the options. Relying on the equipment companies to provide information
or using the expertise of a salesman only adds to their dilemma and confusion
as they are obviously biased. Maintenance and repair of the equipment
becomes a problem if a product is chosen that is not carried by the company
that services the area in which the family lives. It is important for
parents to find assistance from someone who can show them a variety of
systems and can listen to their needs and concerns. I think a trial period
on the equipment is a good idea. Some vendors will allow the family to
try the equipment for a week or a month. This gives the families a chance
to become familiar with the device and actually see if the child can learn
to use it. Otherwise parents may spend thousands of dollars on equipment
their child will never use. The other issue is
"how do we keep up?" Technology is moving ahead at such a rapid
rate that it is overwhelming for non-professionals. Classes in computer
technology that I took five years ago, are not valid anymore as the devices
I learned about are almost obsolete. For teachers and therapists without
access to major hospitals or treatment centers specializing in children
with disabilities, it is very hard to be knowledgeable about current technology.
Families may find it very difficult to keep up without major expenditures
of time, energy and money. In a time when there
is a lot of talk about case managers and family empowerment, these questions
are important to ask. Is the concept of a technology advocate being addressed?
This could be a person who has current knowledge of assistive technology
and can help families to select systems by explaining all the options
available. The advocate could also assist families in learning how to
use the equipment and handle maintenance issues and routines for usage.
Funding strategies could be explored by someone besides the parents thus
decreasing stress and protecting the family's privacy and self-esteem.
Maybe families could avoid some of the pitfalls that come with high-tech
answers to very emotion-filled problems. The whole idea of
technology for kids, little kids, is an exciting yet emotional subject.
So many things can be accomplished with computers. This can give children
the power of speech, the ability to produce written materials, to manipulate
pages, to control their environment in many different ways and to compete
with their peers. How exciting this is for the parents of children with
otherwise little ability to be involved. I remember how exciting this
whole area was for me four years ago, as we prepared for and finally ordered
the "big system" for Colin. I thought this would be the answer
to all of our frustrations and limitations. Finally, Colin could feel
some independence and things could be more normal. But technology is
not the sole answer. Without it, Colin has little chance but with it the
chance is only slightly better. The bottom line is that it takes a lot
of commitment and follow-through on the part of parents, teachers, and
everyone who works with a child. These assistive devices are only the
beginning of a long road to independence, not the end. It takes a tremendous
amount of work and coordinated effort to make it usable. Indeed, sometimes
it seems like more work and hassle to use the technology than to use the
more convenient manual boards and eye pointing strategies we were used
to. These strategies are always available, do not need to be programmed,
turned on, or have their batteries charged. It reminds me of an afternoon,
recently, that we spent at a children's center nearby doing trials and
assessment on communication systems with Colin. The therapists there had
set out and programmed three different devices for us to try. They put
them in front of Colin who was excited with all three and they worked
and played for several hours. When, at last, they were finished and had
removed the array of keyboards and monitors, exposing Colin's own manual
alphabet on the wheelchair tray, Colin began to spell in earnest. The
experts sat and watched intently as he very clearly and urgently spelled
out P-O-T-T-Y. The message had not been programmed into any of the fancy
systems that had been covering his tray. We need to work on both manual
systems that offer convenience and tech systems that offer advancement
and independence. Technology can't do the job alone. I have, thus, learned
not to put all my eggs in one basket, so to speak. We need to work on
many fronts if we are to get the success we want for our children. Technology
is just one of those fronts. We need to spend as much time teaching our
children to have self-esteem, to have appropriate social skills, to be
survivors, to care about others, to be able to communicate basic wants
on their own in case the system breaks downs, to be able to protect themselves
and to be happy with their lives. We also need to teach the rest of the
world to be accepting and tolerant. We need to prepare a place for our
children to live as adults. We taught Colin to
make choices and the choice he made four years ago was not to use the
"big system" we had chosen for him. In all our excitement to
purchase the technology for him we had forgotten to look at how he wanted
to operate such a system. We purchased him a head pointing system and
he wanted to touch with his hands. He would just put his head down and
tune us out. I still believe this was a good device for Colin's body.
He had less tone in his whole body, less drooling, and the capacity for
more speed in his responses. There must have been something about it that
he couldn't deal with. All the assessments, videotapings, and discussions
had dealt with the right components but not with the whole child. What
about his need to directly visualize choicemaking and his growing need
to manipulate things with his hands? I have learned that we need to look
at factors other than the obvious, testable, measurable ones. Maybe we
need to include our children, even the children who do not seem to have
the ability to understand the process, in our decision making and to respect
whatever input they can give us. Another factor that
makes technology especially difficult for young children is our inability
to predict the future. I look at my son's growth and maturation as being
more of an evolution. His disabilities mask so much. As we slowly work
our way through the things that limit what he can do, we discover more
and more about what he is able to do. I am amazed, as well, at how many
unpredictable factors are in his life. Just changing his medications or
even the dosages, alters not only his body but, more subtly, his personality
and his cognitive performance. How can we choose a very expensive piece
of sophisticated equipment with the hope that it will last him ten years?
I have no idea what Colin will be like in ten years or even next year.
We can't wait to offer him the advantages of technology though. We have
to deal with now and sort of bank on the future. But I have confidence
that he'll do everything we expect him to do and probably more. Every
chance Colin has to do things on his own he takes. He taught himself to
read and to tell time. Last week, he indicated on his alphabet broad that
he wanted to watch SCOOBY DOO on TV. We should know better than to question
his memory but we looked in the TV directory to see if it was on. Sure
enough, it was just starting. So, to let him know he was right, we showed
him the directory. Now he wants to look at the directory every day to
see what's on. We have done all we can think of to give him a sense of
control in his life. Giving him the power to communicate his wants has
been wonderful, but communicating at a higher level has been even better.
The day he said SORRY after he had screamed uncontrollably about something,
or the first MOMMY and I LOVE YOU are treasures for us. What a wonderful
thing; to be able to express thoughts and feelings. He even tells jokes
and laughs. Thank goodness we could unlock some of those doors for him.
Last night, after several helpings of dinner, Colin looked up and grinned.
M-M-M-DELICIOUS MR PIG ALL DONE. I'm afraid not, Mr. Colin you're not
all done by a long way!
National Information Center
for Children and Youth with Disabilities
P.O. Box 1492
Washington, DC 20013
1-800-695-0285 (Voice/TT)
E-mail: nichcy@aed.org
Web site: http://www.nichcy.org/ |